"Genocide" versus "Holocaust"

 I often see people supporting Israel simply because they believe it is the "right thing to do" based upon their own faith, be it Christian, Catholic, etcetera. Given that religion is merely another method of control put into motion by people long gone to history, a guise with the basis founded in "divide and conquer" tactics, I am amazed by the support given by the separate religions/theologies. But to give and commit to such support without knowing the facts of their actions, OR the true intentions of them, simply because of the call to do so by friends or "the faith" is ludicrous. I submit to the readers that the JEWISH word "holocaust" is used for a specific reason in reference to the atrocities that were committed upon the Jewish people in Nazi Germany during the 1930s-40s, rather than the word "genocide".

Firstly, let's take a look at the Jewish people themselves. MANY of the supporters of Israel do not know that there are two distinct and separate people of the Jewish faith. The Ashkenazi and the Sephardic. The former being the ruling majority of the faith for thousands of years now over the Sephardic, and continuing today in Israel itself. MANY supporters do not know that the Ashkenazi hold nothing but contempt for the Sephardic, and persecute them continually, denying them the same Rights as the Ashkenazi to everything from holding public offices to individual housing and even decisions of marriage.

Finally, now this is going to shock most, and I am sure I will be the brunt of much backlash, but the truth is the truth. Let us finally define "Genocide" and the JEWISH WORD "Holocaust". "Genocide" MEANS "The deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation.". Historically TO THE JEWISH PEOPLE, "Holocaust" MEANS "A Jewish sacrificial offering that is burned completely on an altar."

Now that we comprehend the TRUE MEANINGS of these two words, does it not seem odd that the latter be adamantly used by the Jewish people for the events that occurred during the time of the Nazi Germany regime? Not when the totality of what occurred during this time is comprehended, that which is NOT to be taught to the public in an act of suppression of the truth. During this time, the Ashkenazi were actually working WITH the Nazis, in an attempt to exterminate the persecuted Sephardic, and they nearly succeeded. Much of the historical evidence has been suppressed or destroyed in an attempt to cover this action up from the world, but there is enough left exposed, and the use of the words themselves left to acknowledge the facts as well. In addition, locate a Sephardic Jewish person and merely politely inquire.



WORDS have specific meanings, and are used specifically for a certain purpose.

WORDS

We commonly use words in general speaking, writing and reading. Where do they come from? What are the actual meanings of the different words? Does it make a difference which word we use?

I am not specifically discussing grammar (or being a grammar nazi), although this also plays a part in this posting, as you will see.

Generally MOST people are under the assumption (incorrectly) that as long as they talk to another human, they convey exactly what they intend to say. If one does not absolutely comprehend the meanings and use of words themselves, how can true intent be conveyed between themselves and another?

Today many of our common words are assumed to have a certain meaning, but in reality they have an original meaning that has been diluted by incorrect use by the general public or simply deferred to have another meaning over the course of time. Nothing can be further than the truth. The original intent is still there, and is meant as such when used in a legal sense throughout documentation and courtrooms. EVERY single word that is spoken, written or read has a specific meaning, and is used for a specific reason. This is absolutely true when applied to ALL legislation ("statutes", "codes" & "law(s)"), contracts, documentation and even in courtrooms. These words can mean the difference between being free, and being locked into a cage.

For example, we often are asked if we "understand". It is generally accepted to mean that we "comprehend", or have good comprehension of what is being intended by another. So why not use the word "comprehend" in the first place? Because the user is actually asking if we "submit" or "decide of our own will to agree". How can this be? Well the word "understand" is actually two single words, replaced into a different order, to "trick" the non-educated or non-enlightened person into a "contract of agreement". If you agree that you "understand", you are agreeing that you "stand under" or "submit to authority". This IS NOT semantics. This is the truth of words. DO THE RESEARCH for yourself.

I suggest to ALL that you use the actual words you intend to convey your intent, and research any that you do not comprehend, especially when it comes to anything in any legal sense, including the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America, as well as all other legislation.

WORDS have specific meanings, and are used specifically for a certain purpose.

Affidavit of Rescission

Public Notice APRIL 14 2014:

Affidavit of Rescission

I hereby affirm that in accordance with international commercial and contract law(s) and the Uniform Commercial Code, as a matter of fact, the UNITED STATES and all subordinate officers, agents, members, departments, agencies and subordinate governing agencies therof have not honorably offered the required full disclosure of terms of participation in any administration, program(s) or contract(s) that I as a human being or a person may have participated in whether knowingly or unknowingly, and due to this fact I further affirm that any and all such administration, contract(s) or program(s) to which I as a human being or a person may have been a party to, are now and always have been null and void, and further affirm that any prior claim of dishonor, restriction or punishment resultant from such claim of dishonor through claim of adhesion to such administration, contract(s) or program(s) shall also be null and void as if to never to have transpired, with the sole exception being honorable completion on my behalf of the ongoing contract(s) of enlistment within the armed services and the ongoing fulfillment of those contract(s) of enlistment and subsequent program(s) related thereto by the UNITED STATES as required by law upon the honorable completion of my terms of those contract(s). Furthermore, no subordinate agent, officer, member, department, agency or subordinate governing agency of the UNITED STATES may make any past or future claim of jurisdiction as I am not a party to any administration, contract(s) or program(s) offered or demanded by the same with the sole exception of the aforementioned contract(s) and/or program(s).

- Original Signature withheld to prevent spam. - 

Ubuntu Launcher Synaptic Quicklist

For those of us who use quicklists in Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric, and prefer to use Synaptic as the package manager, and have it "pinned" to our launcher, I have written a file to allow right-click access to the Software Sources and Update Manager from the launcher icon, much like one commonly used for the "Home" folder.

Simply copy code to a file named synaptic.desktop, and place in the /home/<USER>/.local/share/applications folder, log out, and log in again to enjoy quicker access!


[Desktop Entry]
Name=Synaptic Package Manager
GenericName=Package Manager
Comment=Install, remove and upgrade software packages
Exec=synaptic-pkexec
Icon=synaptic
Terminal=false
StartupNotify=true
Type=Application
Categories=PackageManager;GTK;System;Settings;
OnlyShowIn=GNOME;Unity;
NotShowIn=KDE;
X-Ubuntu-Gettext-Domain=synaptic

X-Ayatana-Desktop-Shortcuts=SU;SP;
[SU Shortcut Group]
Name=Update Manager
Exec=update-manager -c
TargetEnvironment=Unity

[SP Shortcut Group]
Name=Software Sources
Exec=gksu software-properties-gtk %u
TargetEnvironment=Unity

Welcome to the NEW home of my blog. I will be uploading the old posts from my personal blog site over the next few months with updates as well, so keep an eye out!

Windows XP, Vista, Starter 7, Trouble Connecting to wireless networks

Because I am often working with wireless networks I have discovered that Windows XP, Vista, and Starter 7 (Often found on netbooks.) will not connect to WEP wireless networks using an ascii (plain text) passkey.

I have found that the culprit is because the Windows OS refuses to encrpyt the passkey from ascii to hexadecimal format when trying to connect. The solution/workaround is to manually enter the passkey in hexadecimal format when setting up the connection.

I am unsure as to whether this also affects older versions of Windows, or that this will be corrected in future releases.

Disable and Remove Apparmor from Ubuntu Linux 7.04-8.10

AppArmor is a security extension (similar to SELinux) that should provide extended security on your Ubuntu system and it usually causes more problems than advantages. It can be removed safely and your system will remain reasonably secure, as nothing on the internet is absolutely secure. (This is a must do step if you want to install ISPConfig)

We can disable it like this:

/etc/init.d/apparmor stop
update-rc.d -f apparmor remove

And remove it with:

apt-get purge apparmor apparmor-utils

-or-

aptitude remove apparmor apparmor-utils

You may then optionally remove the apparmor & apparmor.d directories & contents from the /etc directory.